The Evolution of the Monarchical Institution in Iran Through the Lens of Carl Schmitt's Theory of Sovereignty

Authors

    Hoora Jafarinia Department of Political Science, University of Yazd, Yazd, Iran
    Morteza Mehrabadi * Department of Political Science, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran morteza.88mehrabadi@gmail.com

Keywords:

Monarchy, State of Exception, Carl Schmitt, Sovereignty, Decision-Making, Political Order, Islamic Revolution

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the historical transformation of the monarchical institution in Iran through the lens of Carl Schmitt’s theory of sovereignty and the state of exception. Adopting an analytical-conceptual approach, the study explores the relationship between Schmitt’s core concepts—including the sovereign, exception, order, and decision-making—and the evolution of monarchy in Iran from ancient times to its collapse in 1979. The article first elaborates Schmitt’s idea that order precedes law and that sovereignty is defined by the capacity to decide in moments of crisis. These theoretical insights are then applied to key phases of Iranian history, including the Achaemenid, Safavid, Qajar, and especially the Pahlavi eras. The findings reveal that the Iranian monarchy, particularly under the Pahlavi dynasty, embodied Schmitt’s notion of sovereign authority and repeatedly confronted exceptional situations that required decisive action beyond legal norms. However, on the eve of the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the monarchy failed to fulfill this sovereign function, lacking the capacity to reestablish political order despite retaining the instruments of power. The paper argues that the fall of the monarchy can be interpreted as a failure of sovereign decision-making. In conclusion, the article critically assesses both the strengths and limitations of Schmitt’s theory in explaining the Iranian case and offers directions for future comparative research on political theory and the history of power in Iran.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrahamian, E. (2008). A History of Modern Iran. Cambridge University Press.

Agamben, G. (2005). State of Exception (K. Attell, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.

Amanat, A. (1997). Pivot of the Universe: Nasir al-Din Shah and the Iranian Monarchy, 1831–1896. University of California Press.

Dyzenhaus, D. (1997). Legality and Legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen and Hermann Heller in Weimar. Oxford University Press.

Keddie, N. R. (2003). Modern Iran: Roots and Results of Revolution. Yale University Press.

Lambton, A. K. S. (1980). State and Government in Medieval Islam: An Introduction to the Study of Islamic Political Theory. Oxford University Press.

McCormick, J. P. (1997). Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as Technology. Cambridge University Press.

Milani, A. (2008). The Shah. Palgrave Macmillan.

Schmitt, C. (1996). The Concept of the Political (G. Schwab, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1932)

Schmitt, C. (2005). Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (G. Schwab, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1922)

Downloads

Published

2024-09-22

Submitted

2024-07-30

Revised

2024-09-05

Accepted

2024-09-14

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Jafarinia, H., & Mehrabadi, M. (2024). The Evolution of the Monarchical Institution in Iran Through the Lens of Carl Schmitt’s Theory of Sovereignty. Iranian Political History Research Journal, 2(3), 60-74. https://iphrj.com/index.php/iphrj/article/view/14

Similar Articles

1-10 of 47

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.