The Impact of British Imperialist Policies on the Formation of the Constitutionalism Discourse in Iran

Authors

    Parisa Najafi Department of History, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
    Amirreza Masoumi * Department of Political Science, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran a.masoumi1970@gmail.com

Keywords:

Constitutionalism, British Imperialism, Political Discourse, Cultural Colonialism, Modern Iranian History, Iranian Modernity

Abstract

This article explores the impact of British imperialist policies on the formation of the constitutionalist discourse in late Qajar Iran. Adopting a historical-analytical approach and drawing on primary sources and archival documents, the study argues that Britain influenced not only Iran’s political and economic structure through direct interventions, but also shaped the country’s intellectual and discursive space via soft power mechanisms, including cultural diplomacy, the press, intellectual networks, and the transmission of modern political concepts. The constitutionalist discourse, as a novel political formation, emerged in the context of both resistance and engagement with imperial forces, reconstructing key concepts such as justice, law, nation, and parliament through a unique synthesis of tradition and modernity. Using historical discourse analysis and postcolonial critique, the article conceptualizes Britain not merely as an imperialist interloper, but as an active element in shaping a new political language in Iran. The findings highlight the pivotal role of the British Embassy, Persian-language press in British territories, diaspora associations, and intermediaries such as Mirza Malkom Khan in introducing and reshaping modern concepts. The emergent discourse left a long-term legacy on Iranian political culture, which still resonates in the contemporary aspirations for legality, justice, and political participation. The article concludes by suggesting that the role of imperial powers in shaping intellectual and political transformations in peripheral societies should be examined through the lens of discursive interaction rather than solely antagonistic frameworks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrahamian, E. (1982). Iran Between Two Revolutions. Princeton University Press.

Abrahamian, E. (2008). A History of Modern Iran. Cambridge University Press.

Amanat, A. (1997). Pivot of the Universe: Nasir al-Din Shah and the Iranian Monarchy, 1831–1896. University of California Press.

Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso.

Bayat, M. (1991). Iran’s First Revolution: Shi’ism and the Constitutional Revolution of 1905–1909. Oxford University Press.

Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). Pantheon Books.

Katouzian, H. (2009). The Persians: Ancient, Mediaeval and Modern Iran. Yale University Press.

Keddie, N. R. (2003). Modern Iran: Roots and Results of Revolution (Updated Edition). Yale University Press.

Martin, V. (1989). Islam and Modernism: The Iranian Revolution of 1906. I.B. Tauris.

Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-05

Submitted

2023-01-21

Revised

2023-02-28

Accepted

2023-03-19

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Najafi, P., & Masoumi, A. (2023). The Impact of British Imperialist Policies on the Formation of the Constitutionalism Discourse in Iran. Iranian Political History Research Journal, 1(1), 1-12. https://iphrj.com/index.php/iphrj/article/view/53

Similar Articles

1-10 of 47

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.